An agency shows you client logos. We show you data. These four cases come from sites we own or operate: we tested everything on ourselves before selling any of it.
Independent measurement tools, dashboards shown live on request
01
First on Invisalign questions, in Ahrefs Brand Radar (US)
#1
Most-cited page on Invisalign questions in US Brand Radar (August 2026, 21 answers)
21
AI answers citing our Invisalign cost page
19
AI answers citing the next source
The context
Ahrefs Brand Radar, US market, questions containing “invisalign”, measured 30 August 2026. The comparison is citation count, not a Google ranking.
The result
dental-area.com/invisalign-cost is the most-cited page on that prompt set (21 AI answers). The next source, MySpecialtyDentist, has 19.
The method, in plain terms
A direct answer in the opening paragraph: the price range and the insurance verdict in two sentences. That is the part AI answers pick up.
Full coverage of the intent on a single URL: pricing, insurance coverage, payment plans.
Precise, checkable figures: price ranges by treatment tier.
No link building at all.
What it proves. On these US questions, a complete, structured answer earned the most citations. That finding is the foundation of everything we do.
02
398 citations inside ChatGPT
398
Citations measured in ChatGPT answers
URL
Verified one URL at a time, not by domain average
2
Assistants carrying most citations
The context
Our English-language dental media for the US market. The objective: be the source AI assistants cite when someone asks a dental question.
The result
398 citations measured inside ChatGPT answers on dental-area.com, verified URL by URL in Ahrefs Site Explorer on 30 August 2026. Copilot adds 590.
The method, in plain terms
Direct answer structure: every page opens with the answer, and assistants lift it as written.
FAQ sections marked up with FAQPage schema on every piece of content.
An anti-regression protocol: on a cited page, every edit is additive, never destructive. We learned it from a real incident, which we resolved, then measured and documented.
Continuous monitoring: every page is tracked on its own citation count, page by page, never as a domain average.
What it proves. AI visibility is not declared, it is engineered. And it is measurable, URL by URL.
03
The recovery of a Paris practice site
50%
Of organic traffic lost in six months
8
Weeks in the rebuild plan
2 to 6
Weeks for a rebuilt page to regain positions
The context
The site of an orthodontic practice we operate had lost roughly half its organic traffic between January and July 2026: publishing had stopped, freshness had decayed, competitors were active, and AI Overviews were eroding click-through rate.
The plan
An eight-week plan: six existing pages rebuilt, two new pieces of content, a fixed weekly publication rhythm, internal linking rebuilt, FAQPage schema applied systematically. Production orchestrated end to end by our system, from brief to delivery.
The first effects
Rebuilt pages regain positions in 2 to 6 weeks, where new content on this site took 8 to 12 weeks to start moving. That gap is the reason for the refresh-to-creation ratio we chose.
The site is in active recovery on its main local query, worth 1,800 searches a month.
What it proves. The method works in repair, not only in construction. And a practice does not need the budget of a dental group to apply it: it needs consistency and method.
04
The AI citation scoreboard we can stand behind
1,030
AI citations to dental-area.com, all platforms
67
Pages cited inside ChatGPT
38
Countries where our English pages are cited, zero translations
The context
On 30 August 2026 we re-pulled Ahrefs Brand Radar and Site Explorer. Across the whole US dental report, institutions still lead. On the commercial questions we actually target (braces cost, Invisalign cost), our pages are among the most cited.
The result
We do not out-cite the ADA across all US dental topics. We do lead specific slices: braces questions (our cost guide, 51 AI answers) and Invisalign questions (our cost page, 21). Site Explorer shows 1,030 all-platform citations to dental-area.com and 398 inside ChatGPT, across 38 countries.
AI citations · US · braces questions
On braces questions, we are first
Our braces cost guideour network
51
DentalPlans
27
MySpecialtyDentist
26
DentalReviewed
22
MySpecialtyDentist
19
Chacon Smiles
18
Our ortho insurance pageour network
17
Zaytoun Orthodontics
16
AI answers citing this page
Ahrefs · 30 August 2026Angela Rossi · dentalog.ai
Orthodontic wax · US
Two of our sites lead the same topic
dental-area.comour network
53
orthodontist-newyork.comour network
51
Colgate
28
Dentaly
24
AI answers citing this page. Our two sites hold the top two spots, with 18 co-citations.
Ahrefs · 30 August 2026Angela Rossi · dentalog.ai
dental-area.com · all platforms
Citations we can stand behind today
1,030
AI citations to dental-area.com, all platforms. ChatGPT: 398. Copilot: 590.
Ahrefs · 30 August 2026Angela Rossi · dentalog.ai
The method, in plain terms
Price content first: precise, dated, segmented ranges. When an AI is asked a price, it looks for a figure it can cite. On braces questions our cost guide gathers 51 AI answers; on Invisalign questions, 21.
Direct answer structure and marked-up FAQs on every page, so the engines have something liftable to
quote.
Several editorial assets pushed independently on the same topic: on orthodontic wax our two sites hold
the top two cited sources and appear together in 18 co-citations.
An anti-regression protocol: a cited page is only ever enriched, never rewritten, with citation checks
three weeks after every edit.
What it proves. AI visibility can be measured page by page, platform by platform. A media site built from zero can out-cite established brands on specific questions. That is the exact method we sell.
Verifiability
These figures come from independent measurement tools (Ahrefs) and are dated August 2026. In a meeting we
show the dashboards live, positions and citations included. No polished screenshots: the data, on screen,
on the day.
Our first-party figures come from measurements on sites we operate. When we have no
first-party data on a subject, we say so rather than borrow someone else's statistic.